What, if anything, is a yearly meeting?

Early in the 21st century, many yearly meetings are in transition. New York and New England Yearly Meetings, where I worked in the 1970’s and 1980’s, claim to include both pastoral and unprogrammed Friends – but the number of pastoral meetings, and the percentage of members in pastoral meetings, have been dropping steadily since the 1950’s. They’re not as inclusive as they like to think they are.

A number of yearly meetings have divided or are in the process of dividing. In Western Yearly Meeting the “center” remained more or less intact, but they lost monthly meetings from both the liberal and evangelical sides. Indiana Yearly Meeting lost about 1/3 of its membership, now mostly joined with the New Association of Friends.

North Carolina Yearly Meeting is in the process of becoming a sort of umbrella organization, which will serve as trustee for the property and administer the investments. Most of the monthly meetings will become part of either the “authority” group (which favors a stronger central authority) or the “autonomy” group (which wants more freedom for monthly meetings in interpreting and applying Faith and Practice). A third group of North Carolina meetings were unwilling to wait around for the division to take place, or just weren’t involved very much with the yearly meeting, and have opted out completely.

Yearly meetings used to act a lot like denominations, with a central office, full-time staff in a variety of ministry areas (Christian Education, peace, youth work and missionary work were all common), elaborate training programs for ministers, health insurance and pension funds, the whole works.

Shrinking and aging membership, economic inflation, and new, rapidly expanding Quaker organizations competing for attention and funds, have all taken a tremendous toll on yearly meetings as they used to exist 40 or 50 years ago.

In one of the first studies I made of Friends, You Can’t Get There From Here (1985) I calculated that most yearly meetings needed at least 1,500 active members in local meetings in order to support 1 full-time equivalent yearly meeting staff person. That was an optimistic figure at the time, and most yearly meeting staffs have shrunk dramatically since then.

Many yearly meetings have given up having a central office, and full or part-time staff now work from their own homes or use space donated by a local meeting. Yearly meetings have been forced to drop health insurance and retirement plans, and many Quaker camps, schools, colleges, retirement communities and missions have been laid down or spun off as independent organizations.

It’s time for Friends to drop the charade and ask ourselves, “What is a yearly meeting today? What are we trying to preserve? What can we build for the next generation?”

In one of the earliest yearly meeting descriptions we have, Friends in Great Britain wrote in 1668: “We did conclude among ourselves to settle a meeting, to see one another’s faces, and open our hearts one to another in the Truth of God once a year, as formerly it used to be.” (Quaker Faith and Practice, Britain Yearly Meeting, 1995, section 6.02)

This is still one of the simplest and most heart-felt reasons for having a yearly meeting – stripped of the generations of tradition and controversy, without the heavy layers of financial and institutional commitment. Unless we have in our hearts a real longing to see one another, to worship together, and listen to each other, yearly meetings will continue to implode.

Friends in the newly-divided yearly meetings are being forced by circumstances to travel more lightly, to be nimbler and less institutional, to live with smaller budgets and focus on worship and fellowship as their primary activities.

In coming posts, I want to share some other ideas about what yearly meetings can be in order to serve a new generation.

Advertisements

6 Responses to “What, if anything, is a yearly meeting?”


  1. 1 Dorothy Grannell March 2, 2017 at 4:49 pm

    One of the differences in NEYM is that the local meeting determines worship format, theology and whether they are open and welcoming. Our Faith and Practice is a guide and not a mandate for practice. In Falmouth Quarter where 2 of the 6 meetings are programmed, we work hard at staying together and sharing our views. True, some NEYM Friends are unaware of the diversity of practice that exists in the YM but that is not unusual due to how many Friends who don’t know their history or only know their own meeting and current history.

  2. 2 quakerkathleen March 3, 2017 at 6:38 pm

    In my YM, New England YM, we hold an overall concern for “support of local meetings” as being a primary goal. I agree – we do long to gather for worship and fellowship and shared work – and often those gatherings are simply what “we cannot do alone” – but never at the expense/substitution of the community building and deep faithful community of local meetings and worship groups. As someone who travels extensively in NEYM, and is also a part time staff member (events coordinator – I plan and support very many of our gatherings and YM Sessions) I see a lot of Life rising in our local meetings (including our pastoral meetings, which are taking on new shapes in some cases). I do think it is important not to think of the YM as a separate body that “imposes” stuff. As a conduit for one way of many in helping us to be faithful, I think changes in structure that focuses on that goal should be welcomed and encouraged. Here’s a list of the “ways” in which we are a YM:
    https://neym.org/neym-does/what-is

  3. 3 Ashley Wilcox March 4, 2017 at 7:40 am

    Interesting post. I’m not sure who you mean by “the next generation.” Do I, as an active 35-year-old Friend, qualify or are you thinking farther into the future?

    I personally don’t have much energy for “building for the next generation”; I think that’s part of what got us all into this mess. I *am* interested in how Friends are following the leading of the Spirit in discerning what to do next (rather than trying to preserve institutions).

  4. 4 Dr. Bruce Arnold March 4, 2017 at 5:03 pm

    That would be North Carolina Yearly Meeting (FUM.) North Carolina Yearly Meeting (Conservative) is not struggling with these issues, thank the Lord.

  5. 5 deborahsuess March 4, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    hey Josh – appreciate your blog and your leadership. can you pl change my email to notascotorsuess@gmail. com thx >


  1. 1 What, if anything, is a yearly meeting? | Through the Flaming Sword Trackback on March 4, 2017 at 6:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Disclaimer

All of the posts on this blog are my own personal opinion. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the members and attenders of the meeting where I belong or any organization of Friends. For more information, click on the "About Me" tab above.

Archive

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 521 other followers


%d bloggers like this: